United Indonesia - Manchester United Indonesia Supporters Club
Register
Go Back   United Indonesia - Manchester United Indonesia Supporters Club > OUTSIDE UNITED > Debate Room

Old 16-04-2014, 11:29 AM   #41
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Manchester City fear UEFA fine for big spending... and may have broken FFP rules

Manchester City are becoming increasingly nervous that they will be one of the first major European clubs to be found in breach of UEFA’s financial fair play rules.

European football’s governing body examined the finances of about 20 clubs who they feel need close examination with regards to FFP. That process - which also includes Chelsea and Paris Saint-Germain - is expected to continue on Wednesday.

Though City were confident when they released their latest annual figures at the end of January that they had done enough to squeeze the right side of UEFA’s guidelines, they have become less certain over recent weeks.


Shock: Manchester City could be hit with a large fine or transfer embargo if found to have breached UEFA's strict Financial Fair Play rules

Officials at the world’s richest football club are unsure about how UEFA view their attempts to add extra revenue streams to their vast business in the last 12 months and are awaiting news with some trepidation.

If City are found to be in breach, they are likely to be fined rather than banned from European competition.

UEFA have indicated all along that they are likely to look favourably on clubs who have made genuine efforts to reduce their losses when it comes to deciding on punishment. City certainly fall into this category, having cut their annual deficit from £98million to £52m over the course of the last two financial years.

Part of that has come through reining in their transfer spending, which has fallen since 2011, when they set a club record with the £38m signing of Sergio Aguero.

Nevertheless, if City were to fail the test it would represent a blow to their reputation and would be an enormous disappointment, given the extraordinary lengths they have gone to in a bid to comply.

City’s official stance yesterday was that they have received no indication from UEFA as regards what may happen.

Nevertheless, at the heart of the club’s anxiety is UEFA’s investigation into City’s unusual decision to sell £24.5m worth of player image rights to an external company. That has never been done before by a leading English club and the interest in the manoeuvre has been heightened by the fact City have declined to reveal the company’s identity.

Quote:
The potential sanctions facing City...
This is a list of UEFA punishments that any club breaching FFP rules could be hit with:
a) warning
b) reprimand
c) fine
d) deduction of points (in Champions League or Europa League)
e) withholding of revenues from a UEFA competition
f) prohibition on registering new players in UEFA competitions
g) restriction on the number of players that a club may register for participation in UEFA competitions, including a financial limit on the overall aggregate cost of the employee benefits expenses of players registered on the A-list for the purposes of UEFA club competitions
h) disqualification from competitions in progress and/or exclusion from future competitions
i) withdrawal of a title or award

Marquee signing: City spent £38m brining Sergio Aguero to the Etihad in July 2011, but such expensive signings may mean City fall foul of FFP regulations

City are also aware that UEFA are examining the way in which the club raised £22.45m from selling their intellectual property rights to outside parties. It is thought this figure includes charging affiliate clubs New York City FC and Manchester Ladies FC for the use of City’s scouting and commercial services.

Finally, UEFA are known to be looking at the structure and market value of the 10-year, £350m deal City struck with Etihad in 2011 to sponsor their stadium, shirts and new training complex.

City are confident that everything they have done to reduce the losses created by the colossal spending of the last five-and-a-half years is above board and able to withstand the most rigorous examination. If they are found in breach of FFP, they may well appeal.

Once UEFA’s club financial control body have met this week they will write to clubs telling them they have passed or failed and offering those in breach a punishment or ‘settlement’.

The clubs will then have until April 30 to accept the sanction or appeal. UEFA would expect to deal with any appeals by May 5 but the matter could in theory drag on all summer if affected clubs appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

UEFA’s FFP guidelines say clubs must keep losses to an aggregate of £37.2m over the 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons and although City’s figure stands at £149.5m, the regulations contain two significant loopholes for clubs looking to prove they are making concerted efforts to reduce their losses.


In trouble: Signings like Edinson Cavani could mean Paris St Germain contravene UEFA's rules

The first is that any club who reduce their deficit between the last two seasons are allowed to write off the wages of any player signed before 2010.

Any spending on youth development, infrastructure and community projects over the past two years’ accounts is also deductible for FFP purposes.

UEFA president Michel Platini, who has driven FFP from its inception, has spoken publicly about throwing clubs out of European competition if they fail the tests but the truth is that UEFA only intend to apply this to repeat offenders.

One further issue that City will also be aware of, though, is that other European clubs can appeal if they think their rivals’ finances have not been examined properly.

Teams like Manchester United and Arsenal, for example, are keen that UEFA implement the rules as stringently as they said they would when FFP was first launched five years ago.

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2605386/Manchester-City-fear-UEFA-fine-continued-big-spending-broken-Financial-Fair-Play-rules.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2014, 10:08 AM   #42
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Man City and PSG amongst those to have breached UEFA Financial Fair Play rules

Manchester City have become one of the first clubs to fail UEFA's new Financial Fair Play rules.

City had been confident of been passing the FFP test but had become aware in recent weeks that European football’s governing body had become sceptical of the manner in which the club increased some of their income streams over the last two years.

Along with French club PSG – who have also failed the test – City have now been offered a settlement – or punishment – by UEFA and it’s up to them if they accept it. If they don’t they can appeal but that opens up the possibility of a stiffer penalty if it fails.


Marquee signings: Sergio Aguero and Zlatan Ibrahimovic cost big money for Man City and Paris Saint-Germain

In all likelihood, City will be fined and will accept the fine.

Last week UEFA president Michel Platini said that he felt it unlikely any team would be banned from European competition this time round.

City, though, will be embarrassed and disappointed by the news. The club’s owners in Abu Dhabi value image and the projection of integrity above anything else and will view this development gravely.

Having tried desperately for two years to curtail the losses incurred by their massive spending on players and infrastructure, City will now hope that their efforts to reduce their massive losses will be taken in to consideration by UEFA.

UEFA have indicated all along that they are likely to be look favourably on clubs who have made genuine efforts to reduce their losses when it comes to deciding on punishment. City certainly fall in to this category, having reduced annual losses from £98m-a-year to £52m-a-year over the course of the last two financial years.

At the heart of City’s anxiety recently has been UEFA’s investigation in to City’s unusual decision to sell £24.5m worth of player image rights to an external company. That has never been done before by a leading English club and the interest in that has only been increased by the fact City have declined to reveal who exactly that company is.


Firm stance: Michel Platini set his financial fair play rules out to clamp down on overspending in football

City were also aware that UEFA were examining the way in which the club raised £22.45m from selling their ‘intellectual property rights’ to outside parties. It is thought that this figure includes charging affiliate clubs New York City FC and Manchester Ladies FC for the use of City’s scouting and commercial services.

Finally, UEFA are known to have be looking at the structure and market value of the ten-year £350m deal City struck with Etihad to sponsor their stadium, shirt and new training complex in 2011.

Just last week, Platini indicated that he was interested in how PSG’s own sponsorship structure worked and it was always likely City’s would come under similar scrutiny.

Platini said: 'I will say simply that Paris St Germain's financial model is distinctive and atypical. That image contract with the QTA, the tourism office of Qatar, is innovative, that's all I can say.

'But is it viable? Is the value of the contract correct? These are questions that the experts must decide.'

Now that City have failed FFP, a 'directly affected party' has 10 days to appeal against any attempt by the club to then cut a deal with UEFA to reduce their sanction.

City would then be exposed to a UEFA tribunal. Arsenal and Liverpool have both made it clear they expect strong enforcement of FFP by Uefa and both clubs could make the challenge - putting them in a state of open conflict with City.

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2615219/Manchester-City-Paris-Saint-Germain-breach-Financial-Fair-Play-rules.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2014, 11:21 AM   #43
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Manchester City Breach FFP Rules, but Could Club Appeals Threaten Worse?



According to Sky Sports, Manchester City face the threat of UEFA sanctions after failing to comply with financial fair play (FFP) rules. The club have been issued with a settlement offer ahead of talks later this week and must now decide whether to accept UEFA's offer or try to negotiate a lesser punishment.

Fewer than 20 clubs have been found guilty of breaching the rules, a list that also includes Paris Saint-Germain, and they could all now face the prospect of anything from a fine to European squad restrictions next season.

Currently, the settlement packages are unknown, but a final decision could become clear as early as Friday of this week. It is thought that expulsion from European competition—the most severe sanction available to UEFA—is an unlikely outcome.

However, according to Ben Rumsby writing in the Telegraph, clubs such as Everton, Liverpool, Arsenal and Manchester United, all of whom may be directly affected by City's spending, could well appeal if they feel the sanctions imposed on the club aren't strong enough, a situation that may lead to UEFA increasing the punishment further.

The current monitoring period assesses club accounts for the last two seasons, with FFP rules only permitting losses of up to £37 million over those two years. City posted losses of £97 million in 2011-2012 and £51.6 million in 2012-2013, making a combined figure of £149 million.

However, club sources told Bleacher Report earlier this month that they felt confident that their case would be looked on more favourably given the almost-halving of their losses, as well as the huge increase in their revenue—up to £271 million 2014, putting them sixth on the Deloitte Football Money League. City are clearly a club on their way to self-sufficiency, exactly what UEFA wants from top sides across Europe.

With City also spending significant sums on youth development and other infrastructure projects, it was felt by many that UEFA would be likely to view that as positive spending—the antithesis of the "financial doping" they are looking to stamp out.

It would seem the chances of a side looking to use private investment as a way of breaking into the top tier of European football, much like City did after their takeover in 2008, are reduced dramatically by FFP, meaning the current crop of clubs who dominate are in a strong position to remain there.

Code:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2045665-manchester-city-breach-ffp-rules-but-could-club-appeals-threaten-worse
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2014, 11:19 AM   #44
J. A. Adji
first team
-
 
 
J. A. Adji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somewhere in Borneo
Posts: 1,211
Thanks: 13
Thanked 51 Times in 43 Posts
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
J. A. Adji is a jewel in the roughJ. A. Adji is a jewel in the roughJ. A. Adji is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Manchester City hit by Uefa with Champions League squad size cut and fine for breaching financial rules

Exclusive: Sanction for spending spree under ownership of Sheikh Mansour could deny club use of millions of pounds worth of their own talent and hurt player recruitment



Manchester City were on Tuesday night facing a cut in their Champions League squad size and a heavy fine for breaching Uefa’s Financial Fair Play regulations.

As revealed by the Telegraph, the investigatory chamber of the European game’s Club Financial Control Body has decided that City’s unprecedented £1 billion spending spree under the ownership of Sheikh Mansour did not comply with FFP rules.

The Telegraph has now learnt that City have been offered a punishment which includes a combination of financial and sporting sanctions – if they agree not to fight their guilty verdict.

The latter penalty would leave the club unable to register a full 25-man squad for the Champions League next season, potentially denying them use of millions of pounds worth of their own talent and hurting their ability to recruit players this summer.

City were given until Thursday to agree what is known as a “settlement” offer with the CFCB, a sanction which is open to negotiation but only to moderate effect.



Were they to fail to reach a consensus or refuse to accept their guilt, their case would transfer to the CFCB’s adjudicatory chamber, which would assess afresh whether they breached FFP and, if so, what punishment to impose.

City and Uefa declined to comment on Tuesday night on precise details of any settlement offer or whether one had already been agreed but European football’s governing body has previously made it clear that fighting on would put a club at risk of a more severe penalty, including expulsion from the Champions League.

Even if City agree to settle their case, FFP rules allow Premier League rivals such as Arsenal and Everton to challenge any sanction they deem too lenient. The latter clubs could argue City’s breach materially affected their chances of finishing third or fourth in the table, and thus hindered their European qualification hopes.

Having posted losses of £149 million between 2011-13 after buying the likes of Sergio Agüero, Samir Nasri, Gaël Clichy, Javi García and Matija Nastasic, the activities of City’s Abu Dhabi-based owners were always going to be heavily scrutinised under regulations that permitted clubs to lose £37.2 million after certain exceptions were discounted.

It is City’s attempts to balance their books which were most closely examined, particularly their 10-year, £350 million sponsorship deal with Etihad, the official airline of Abu Dhabi.

FFP rules prohibit transactions with companies which have ties to a club or their owners being used in this way unless they can be shown to represent fair market value. Designed to prevent wealthy owners artificially inflating the value of such deals, their validity is judged on three criteria.

If it is shown to be a related-party transaction, Uefa’s auditors calculate how much equivalent media exposure would have cost through the company advertising in other ways, how the tie-up compares with those struck by similar clubs, and what independent marketing experts think of the agreement.

City have always insisted that the deal is no more unfair when measured on a like-for-like basis than those struck by their closest rivals, including Manchester United and that their losses are moving in the right direction.

Paris St-Germain are the other big name to have been found guilty of breaching FFP by the CFCB’s investigatory chamber and they were also made a settlement offer including financial and sporting sanctions.

PSG had previously argued that their €200 million-a-year (£167 million) commercial arrangement with the Qatar Tourism Authority is above board but it emerged last month that Uefa had serious doubts over its validity and the French champions’ attitude to scrutiny of it.

The Uefa president, Michel Platini, told Le Parisien last week: “Do PSG respect the Financial Fair Play rules? Not sure ... not at all sure. Let’s just say that the economic model of PSG is unique and not normal.”

Promising “significant sanctions will hit the big clubs”, he added: “The first decisions will be announced in early May. But if you expect blood and tears, you will be disappointed. There will be some tough things but, I think, no exclusions from European competitions.”

The CFCB investigatory chamber will meet on Thursday, and possibly Friday, to approve settlement offers agreed with the less than 20 clubs found to have breached FFP regulations and refer any outstanding cases to the adjudicatory chamber.

Settlement offers will not be rubber-stamped by the head of the investigatory chamber, the former Belgian Prime Minister Jean-Luc Dehaene, until next week. That means clubs are not expected to be formally named and shamed for at least a week.



Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/manchester-city/10797048/Manchester-City-hit-by-Uefa-with-Champions-League-squad-size-cut-and-fine-for-breaching-financial-rules.html
J. A. Adji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 12:23 PM   #45
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

PSG escape with £20m fine for breaching UEFA Financial Fair Play rules

UEFA are set to further infuriate Manchester City by announcing that Paris Saint-Germain will face only a £20million one-off fine for breaching Financial Fair Play regulations.

City are already upset with European football's governing body over proposals to fine them £49m, payable in three instalments, and impose sanctions that would cut their Champions League squad cut from 25 to 21.


Money matters: PSG coach Laurent Blanc will have to change his plans despite winning the French league


Party time: PSG players celebrate winning the French title on Wednesday night

It was thought that big-spending PSG would face a similar 'settlement' following an investigation into their finances - in particular a £167m sponsorship deal with Qatar Tourist Authority.

However, Sportsmail can reveal that PSG, confirmed as French champions on Wednesday night, will face a significantly smaller fine.

The move will incense City's Abu Dhabi owners, who feel harshly treated after reducing their annual losses from £98m to £52m over the past two years.

City are believed to have until Friday to accept the settlement or appeal to a panel empowered to impose even harsher, non-negotiable sanctions, including possible Champions League exclusion.

It was unclear whether PSG would face similar Champions League squad cuts and imposition of a salary cap but coach Laurent Blanc admitted

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2622890/PSG-escape-20m-fine-breaching-UEFA-Financial-Fair-Play-rules.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2014, 12:09 PM   #46
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Khaldoon hits out at UEFA over Financial Fair Play

City chairman 'disagrees' with UEFA findings, insists club will continue with a financial model he calls 'right for football' and makes a thinly-veiled dig at United's owners the Glazers.



City chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak took a swipe at rival clubs like United who lean on debt as he defended the club against UEFA’s punishment.

The Blues supremo said that history will prove that City’s model of heavy investment in the club at all levels is the right one.

But for the moment he said City have to ‘take a pinch’ and swallow the penalties handed out for their breach of financial fair play rules.

He also said that the club will break even this year and turn a profit next year, which means they will dodge £32million of the £49million fine levied by UEFA.

But they still face caps on their wages and transfer spending and restriction of their Champions League squad to 21 players next season.

Khaldoon expressed the belief that City’s model is preferable to clubs like United, whose owners piled £350million of debt against the club when they took over.

“We have a sustainable project today, in Manchester and across the board in the City Football Group,” he said.

“We have zero debt. We don’t pay a penny to service any debt. For me, that is a sustainable model.

“However, our friends at UEFA seem to believe otherwise. They have their view, we have ours.

“I disagree with their views, but we are pragmatic and one thing our fans need to know, we will do, as always, what is best for this club and the fans and if that means sometimes we have to take a pinch, we will take a pinch and move on.”

He also pointed out exactly what City have been punished for doing and said: “Six years ago we started a journey of investment. We invested in the club and in Manchester – the club was 20th in terms of revenue among clubs in Europe.

“It was very challenging and had a lot of debt, poor infrastructure and difficulties attracting talented players to compete to win leagues domestically and in Europe.

“Over six years, step by step, we have invested in this club, in the stadium and in the best youth facilities in Europe that will come onstream this year as we try to see the success of our commitment to youth.

“This has been a strategy, to invest in top players from around the world, good players, talented players, good people.

“We have continued with our commercial strategy and today we have partners all over the world, from Japan to South America, North America to Africa and the Middle East. We went on a commercial blitz over six years and are seeing the results.

“We went from an investment strategy that was targeting effectively six years of heavy investment in building up this ethos and infrastructure, to get us to where we are.

“This year, we will break even and next year we will go into profitability, while maintaining everything I mentioned. We will keep investing in the club at every level – we will keep investing in youth.”

City initially took a stand against UEFA’s punishment, but backed down last week amid fears that UEFA could try to expel them from the Champions League had they stuck to their guns.

Khaldoon said that was a decision taken in the best interests of the club, adding: “We will be pragmatic and move on and know that we have the right model and we believe in this model. At the same time it will not compromise us or the strategy we have started and that we will continue to implement.

“I am looking forward to an interview six years from now when we look back at these rules and regulations that have been put in place which have a particular model in mind, and the model we started on six years ago and will take us for the next six years.

“I think then, history will judge what was right for football. I have all the confidence in the world in where we are going to be in six years and what we are going to show in terms of being the right model.”

Code:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-city-chairman-khaldoon-al-7147880
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2014, 12:15 PM   #47
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Manchester City £50m FFP fine will fund rival clubs including Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United confirm UEFA

* City fined £50million for breaking financial fair play regulations
* Could be reduced to £20million if they comply with rules in future
* Money will be shared around European clubs who did meet requirements
* Clubs will meet to discuss changes to the rules in October


UEFA have confirmed that Manchester City's £50million fine for breaching financial fair play rules will be shared out around the other clubs in the Champions League.

The first payments from City, Paris St Germain and Zenit St Petersburg (the other clubs who broke FFP rules last season) will total £20million.

They will be split among the Champions League and Europa League clubs who did comply with the rules last season, including Premier League rivals Arsenal, Chelsea and Manchester United.

City were fined £50million for the FFP breaches but will only have to pay around £20million if they comply with the break-even rules in future seasons.

A similar sum will be distributed to clubs who comply with the FFP rules in this season's European competitions.

European Clubs' Association chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge said UEFA had agreed the fines should go to the other clubs.

He told a news conference in Geneva last week: 'It was an agreement between UEFA and the clubs that it was money belonging to the clubs.'

The clubs will have a chance to argue any changes to FFP rules at a meeting with UEFA on October 13.


Advantage: The money City have been fined will be redistributed to other Champions League clubs

UEFA president Michel Platini said in his speech to the ECA: 'The framework for financial fair play must be dynamic, it must evolve constantly, which is why I have convened an important round table on the subject with your representatives at UEFA headquarters on 13 October.

'We will see whether any imperfections can be ironed out and whether there is room to further improve the system.'


Buying: Manchester City owner Sheikh mansour shows no sign of stopping his spending spree

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2761254/Manchester-City-50m-FFP-fine-fund-rival-clubs-including-Arsenal-Chelsea-Manchester-United-confirm-UEFA.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-09-2014, 10:35 AM   #48
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Liverpool set to be investigated for breaching financial fair play regulations

* UEFA are set to investigate Liverpool over FFP breaches
* Governing body is also looking at Monaco, Inter Milan and Roma
* Reds will not suffer financial sanctions but risk having their Champions League prize money withheld
* Liverpool made a loss of £49.8m last season, although they hope to write off a large proportion as allowable stadium expenditure
* Manchester City and PSG have already been heavily hit for breaking rules


Liverpool are being investigated by UEFA for possible breaches of their financial fair play rules.

Liverpool, Monaco, Inter Milan and Roma — who were all absent from European competition last season and have recently submitted accounts to UEFA — are due to be asked for further information about their finances.

No financial sanctions will be imposed at this stage, though a provisional sanction to withhold Champions League money is possible as a next step.


UEFA is set to investigate Liverpool for breaching financial fair play regulations


The Reds are hoping to write off proportion of losses as allowable stadium expenditure

The Merseyside club made a loss of £49.8million for the 2012-13 season, and £40.5m for the 10-month period before that.

Liverpool will hope to avoid any sanctions by writing off a big chunk of losses as allowable stadium expenditure.

The 2011-12 accounts reported that £49.6m was associated with Liverpool’s stadium costs, £35m of which was related to the aborted plan to build a new home at Stanley Park.

UEFA’s FFP rules say losses must be no more than £35.4m over the 2011-12 and 2012-13 seasons, but allow expenses such as youth development and stadium costs to be written off.

Meanwhile, Rickie Lambert has asked Liverpool’s conditioning team to intensify his training regime in an attempt to kick-start his Anfield career.

The England striker made his first start since his £4m move from Southampton in Tuesday’s Capital One Cup win over Middlesbrough and was made captain. But he was substituted in the second half.

Lambert, 32, has been a bit-part player so far and believes a lack of time on the pitch has hit his form. He said: ‘I wasn’t happy with my performance, so that overshadowed the honour of being captain a little bit. I didn’t feel as sharp as I want to feel. That’s the main thing I want to look at going back into training.

‘I want to get my match fitness up because obviously everyone knows I’m not playing every game, so I have to adapt now. I’m going to have to do more, so my fitness is up to the same level as everybody else.

‘It’s my sharpness and my fitness which I need to get on the training pitch and start improving. I do work, push myself to the limit, but maybe I am going to have to go to the fitness coach and see if I can do more.’

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2768316/Liverpool-set-investigated-breaching-financial-fair-play-regulations.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2016, 12:55 PM   #49
zudomiriku
moderator
Happy New Year 2023
 
 
zudomiriku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Kemang(gisan)
Posts: 24,492
Thanks: 5,047
Thanked 1,785 Times in 921 Posts
Mentioned: 274 Post(s)
zudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond reputezudomiriku has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

Galatasaray slapped with two-season ban from UEFA competitions after breaking Financial Fair Play rules

* Galatasaray broke UEFA rules on the level of financial losses allowed
* The Turkish giants' ban was confirmed by UEFA on Wednesday
* In 2014, UEFA fined Galatasaray £155,000 and required the club to break even on football-related trading over a three-year period


Turkish champions Galatasaray have been handed a ban from European club competitions by UEFA following their breach of financial fair play regulations.

The Istanbul-based side, who are currently fifth in their domestic league and have Wesley Sneijder and Lukas Podolski in their squad, will be excluded from featuring in the next continental competition they qualify for over the next two seasons.

Their case was referred to UEFA's adjudicatory chamber in January after they were found to have failed to have met the governing body's break-even requirements for the 2015-16 season.



The Turkish giants have been banned from UEFA competitions after breaking Financial Fair Play rules

And UEFA have now meted out their punishment to Gala, who were eliminated from this season's Champions League at the group stage and then bowed out of the Europa League last month.

A statement on Wednesday read: 'The Adjudicatory Chamber of the UEFA Club Financial Control Body (CFCB) today announced that Galatasaray AS will be excluded from participating in the next UEFA club competition for which they would otherwise qualify in the next two seasons (i.e. the 2016/17 and 2017/18 seasons).

'This decision was taken after Galatasaray failed to comply with the terms of the settlement agreement that it entered with the CFCB chief investigator in May 2014 under Article 15 of the procedural rules governing the UEFA CFCB.

'The Turkish club has also been ordered to limit the overall aggregate cost of the employee benefits expenses of all its players in each of the next two reporting periods (i.e. the reporting period ending in 2016 and the reporting period ending in 2017.'

Galatasaray official Iskender Baydar says club directors are meeting and 'examining the text of the decision,' and will issue a statement later on Wednesday.

UEFA's club finance panel can sanction teams who overspend or miss financial targets.

In 2014, UEFA fined Galatasaray £155,000 (200,000 euros) and required the club to break even on football-related trading over a three-year period.

Galatasaray won the 1999-2000 UEFA Cup final on penalties - defeating Arsenal 4-1 in the shootout.

Code:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3472907/Galatasaray-slapped-two-season-ban-UEFA-competitions-breaking-Financial-Fair-Play-rules.html
__________________
UNITED INDONESIA GO GREEN
zudomiriku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2016, 05:30 AM   #50
victory II
academy
pengganti Victory
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
victory II Ready for being a real United Indonesia
Default Re: UEFA - Financial Fair Play

kalo Galatasaray punya koneksi ke Timur Tengah, ga bakalan tuh di suspend dari kejuaraan Eropa nasib tim 'kecil'
victory II is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


(View-All Members who have read this thread : 117
adefebsa, adi_Giggsy, agylbonez, ahmad nawawi, ali_iyan, Aman, amed_aja, Anak.Kecil, anas95, and1, andiancha, Anto MJ, arief_oct, arik_, aris setiyawan, arymashuda, ayahocta, badbatak, bang_zak, beckz_on7, Blacklist7, bucay deathbat, cahya3nugraha, chest, chincarito, christof_ww, ctwoprod, danygiggsy, dayat_5, dekepiks, dudut, ecly_watchaa, endhy_cantona, eyeofday, fachryandrea, fadilbedil, Fajar_, fajrinited, farozy, Febribule, febza, ferly_Liemz, fey777, fmymu, fredrian.seven, frengkysme182, frmnsyh_KEANO, glngakbar, Gustar_UIBontang, h-ANG, Hamka Husain Pasonai, handa budi, Hand_rooney, Hendy, hwstars94, iamsetia, indraiebe, irfi_1, J. A. Adji, King_Cantona, Lang25, loveUNITED, moesick, MUFC1878, mYa United, mygalzbiatch, Noe26, ocki_26, oldark, OrangeCreativeDesign, OSziXXoztn, paiman, penk22_, prahmono, putra_ME, randiex, rasyidrdh, Rean, Red Army, RedMachine, Redsbusby, rio vander vidic, Riskur, robby7beckham, RyanRezha, Ryan_lallo, Shi no Gekai, shinjie26, SR 7, stamansa, tasho, The King, theater of dream, Triguna Wibawa, tumpal_oneunited, UdyMUFC, uicb-dyz, UNITED1878, united7, unitedfanz, Van_Munandar, Victory, victory II, whoami, winoto, wrzt, yandi, yoga10, YRgoFManpm, yudha septian, zudomiriku, Zulfan
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manchester United - Biz, Financial news 'n rumors rondwisan United News 943 25-01-2023 08:53 AM
Sportifitas, Fair Play, what else .. ??? rondwisan General Football 62 01-04-2013 02:50 PM
FIFA Financial Fair Play anumu General Football 11 28-11-2011 02:16 AM
Who's player you play look like ? :D theater of dream United Lounge 67 09-02-2011 10:18 PM
UEFA Europe League rondwisan Previews & Reviews 16 20-03-2010 12:47 PM



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
United Indonesia - Manchester United Supporters Club of Indonesia